Did you protect an Italian citizenship filing before 28 March 2025?

Compare the three protected filing categories tied to 23:59 Rome time on 27 March 2025 and see which evidence matters.

What was the protected filing cutoff?

The key time was 23:59 Rome time on 27 March 2025.

A case may preserve the old-law test if it fits one of three categories in Article 3-bis:

  1. an administrative application submitted with the required documents to the correct office,
  2. an appointment communicated by the cutoff, followed by filing on that appointment date, or
  3. a court application filed by the cutoff.

These categories are not interchangeable. Article 3-bis Law 74/2025 coordinated text

What counts as a complete administrative filing?

Article 3-bis refers to an application presented with the necessary documentation to the competent consulate or mayor by the cutoff.

This raises practical questions:

Starting a document search or contacting an office is not the same as presenting the required application.

Keep the complete packet, delivery proof, payment evidence, receipt, protocol number, and every message from the office.

What counts as a protected appointment?

The appointment must have been communicated by the competent office by the cutoff. The applicant then files on the appointment date stated by that communication.

Keep:

A request for an appointment is not the same as an appointment communicated by the office.

What if you tried to book but never received an appointment by the cutoff? That issue remains legally sensitive. Judgment 63/2026 did not settle every case involving an inaccessible booking system or a process started without a communicated appointment. Order 147/2026 also records ongoing litigation around this area.

What counts as a protected court filing?

The court application must have been filed by the cutoff.

You should preserve:

Do not assume that a filing by one relative automatically protects an unnamed child, sibling, or cousin.

Does protection mean the case succeeds?

No.

Protection may preserve the law that applies to the recognition test. It does not:

The authority or court still examines the substantive family history and evidence.

What if the filing was made after the cutoff?

A later filing does not restore the old rules.

A foreign-born applicant who holds another citizenship must instead check the current Article 3-bis exceptions. The main alternatives concern:

Read the parent and grandparent exceptions guide before deciding that a late filing ends every possible route.

What should you collect now?

Build one folder with:

  1. the complete filing or pleading,
  2. the appointment communication, if used,
  3. every timestamp and receipt,
  4. the list of named applicants,
  5. requests for missing documents,
  6. any refusal or court decision, and
  7. the civil and citizenship chain supporting the underlying case.

The main point: the cutoff may decide which law applies, but it does not decide whether the family chain works.

Official sources

Protected filing questions

Was joining a waiting list enough?
Not by itself. The statute names an application submitted with the required documents to the correct office, a filing on an appointment communicated by the cutoff, or a court case filed by the cutoff.
Does a protected appointment prove citizenship?
No. It may preserve the old-law test. The chain, evidence, and final recognition or court decision still matter.
Can one family filing protect everyone?
Do not assume that. Named applicants, later-added relatives, and the effect of one decision on another person require legal review.
Review my Italian family line

The screening identifies possible routes and evidence gaps. It is not an official decision.